Real science logo by Douglas Blane

real

science

Please mouseover difficult words to see what they mean

University of Wisconsin-Madison: 10-Dec-2007

Modern humans in evolutionary fast lane

New research shows that humans have been evolving rapidly for the past 40,000 years. This challenges the widespread belief that human evolution has slowed to a crawl or even stopped.

 

The new study finds that modern humans' recent past has been a time of extra-fast evolution. This has been driven by cultural changes and an explosive increase in population.

 

Data for the study came from an international genomics project. The work is published in the 10 Dec issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The research team was led by University of Wisconsin-Madison anthropologist John Hawks.

 

Hawks estimates that positive selection in the past 5,000 years has been happening roughly 100 times as fast as at any time in human evolution.

 

Many of the new genetic changes are linked to alterations in human diet caused by the coming of agriculture (Note 1). Another source of change has been resistance to diseases, says the research team. These became major killers when humans first began to live in cities.

 

The findings will likely lead to a rethinking of our ideas about human evolution, Hawks says. In particular the notion that modern culture has ended evolution in humans does not seem to be true at all.

 

“We are more different genetically from people living 5,000 years ago than they were different from Neanderthals,” Hawks says.

 

The research team analysed data from the international HapMap project. This is a global effort to find all the genetic similarities and differences in human beings. It studies genes from distinct populations around the world.

 

HapMap will in time be used to identify genes that affect human health. But it can also provide a map of genetic variation in our ancestors.

 

More than 99% of the human genome is the same across all humans. But there are a large number of differences in DNA called single nucleotide polymorphisms or SNPs (Note 2). This is pronounced “snips”.

 

The Hapmap project has mapped roughly 4 million of these SNPs. There are estimated to be 10 million of them in all. The project is also identifying different regions of DNA known as haplotypes, which contain a large number of SNPs and are shared by many people.

 

All this Hapmap data is being used in many ways by scientists around the world. The research carried out by Hawk and his colleagues is using a technique called linkage disequilibrium decay or LDD.

 

Human DNA is shuffled from one generation to the next. This is called 'recombination'. But a chunk of DNA that gives its owner an advantage quickly spreads through a population. So long, uninterrupted segments carried by large numbers of people are strong evidence of a fairly recent evolutionary change - recent enough for recombination not to have broken them up again. This is what the scientists have been looking for.

 

Using this test, they found evidence of recent selection on roughly 1,800 genes. This is 7% of all human genes.

 

Conventional wisdom is that the pressures of natural selection on humans are less nowadays than in the past, Hawks says. But genetic changes are now being driven by major changes in human culture .

 

A good example is lactase, the substance that helps people digest milk. The gene for this normally stops being active when children grow up. But northern Europeans have developed a variety of the gene that lets them drink milk all their lives. This is a recent adaptation caused by farming and the widespread use of milk.

 

The biggest new pathway for selection is in resistance to disease, Hawks says. People started living in much larger groups and settling in one place roughly 10,000 years ago. That's when epidemic diseases such as malaria, smallpox and cholera began to dramatically change the patterns of deaths.

 

Malaria is one of the clearest examples, Hawks says. Scientists have found more than two dozen genetic adaptations related to malaria resistance. These include a whole new blood type known as the Duffy blood type.

 

Another recently discovered gene, CCR5, first appeared about 4,000 years ago. It now exists in about 10% of European people. It was discovered recently because it makes those who have it resistant to HIV/AIDS. But its original value might have been in fighting smallpox.

 

“There are many things under selection that are making it harder for pathogens to kill us,” Hawks says.

 

Population growth is making these changes happen much faster than they would otherwise have done. Charles Darwin pointed out that the size of the herd “is of the highest importance for success”. This is because the larger the population the more genetic variation there is in it.

 

It is the same for humans. The population of the world has grown very rapidly. There were only a few million people 10,000 years ago. This had grown to 200 million people by the beginning of the Christian era.

 

By the year 1700 there were 600 million people in the world. And today there are more than 6.5 billion.

 

Before these times, the population was so small for so long that positive selection happened very, very slowly, Hawks says.

 

The recent changes are especially striking. “Five thousand years is such a small sliver of time. It's 100 to 200 generations ago,” he says.

 

“That's how long it's been since some of these genes originated, and today they are in 30 or 40% of people because they've had such an advantage.

 

"It's like ‘invasion of the body snatchers.'”

 

Notes

1) The “coming of agriculture” hyperlink is to an online video from Annenberg, which requires first-time users to register. The process is free and straightforward.

 

2) The SNPs hyperlink is to a page of video clips. Scroll down to the one entitled “Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms”.

 

More help with words

average

breed

conception

fertile

fertilisation

genes

genome

hypothesis  

inherited

molecule

origins

species

sperm

tentative

 

What's it all about?

  1. What is the main conclusion of this latest research?
  2. What are the two causes of this, according to the scientists?
  3. Did they carry out experiments themselves or use existing data?
  4. How much faster has human evolution been happening in the past five thousand years than at any time before?
  5. Very many of the new genetic changes are concerned with what we eat. What is the other main source of change?
  6. What has changed about human behaviour in the past 5000 years to make this more important than before?
  7. Do these new results match what was previously thought about human evolution?
  8. What is the most important application of data from the HapMap project?
  9. This latest project is using the HapMap data in a different way. To do what?
  10. What is a SNP?
  11. Ten million single nucleotides can be different between one human and the next. But 99% of the human genome is the same for all of us. So how many single nucleotides are there on the human genome?
  12. What is recombination?
  13. In your own words explain the sentence that begins "But a chunk of DNA that gives its owner an advantage …
  14. In your own words explain the next sentence that begins "So long, uninterrupted segments …
  15. In what fraction of human genes did the scientists find evidence of recent evolutionary changes?
  16. Most people believe that evolutionary pressures on humans are less now than before we became civilised. In one sentence how is modern medicine part of this reduced pressure to evolve?
  17. But according to these scientists evolution in humans is happening much faster than ever. It's just that the pressures to evolve don't come from the rigours of winter and wild animals. They come from what?
  18. What kind of scientific statement is the answer to the last question? Is it a new finding, a hypothesis or a piece of existing knowledge?
  19. Hawks provides a number of examples of recent evolutionary changes due to disease and different ways of living. Are these part of his new findings?
  20. Do they help to support these findings?
  21. If you think they do support them explain why. If you think they don't explain why not. Use no more than one sentence in either case.
  22. In your own words and one sentence why is the rapid increase in the human population helping to make evolution happen much faster than before?

 

 

Science news

wp96399bdd.png

More science teaching resources for this story

 

 

Humans evolving fast UK US

 

 

10-Dec-2007

 

Human biology

wp634b75bf.png
wp173a7d0c_1b.jpg